Equities   |   Oct 14, 2020

Conviction Versus Quantity

Diversification is an established concept from which several fields – from agriculture to sociology – have benefitted, and finance is chief among them. Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) has illustrated that combining multiple holdings in a portfolio lowers its risk without necessarily sacrificing its return. Such diversification benefits are evident in equity investment, and over the decades, empirical research has found that investors can actually capture most of the diversification benefits with approximately 30 randomly-selected portfolio holdings.¹

Nevertheless, there remain fears of being too diversified or too concentrated, and the financial community is still divided about the “ideal” number of stocks to hold in a portfolio to achieve diversification and an optimal risk/reward balance. While we’d agree that investors shouldn’t put all their eggs in one basket, we also question whether the debate surrounding the ideal number of stocks is asking the wrong question entirely. More specifically, we posit that while portfolio diversification is key to investing success, the more pertinent factor driving this diversification isn’t the quantity of stocks, but rather, a portfolio manager’s conviction in the names they hold.


1 For example, see Statman, Meir. “How Many Stocks Make a Diversified Portfolio?” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 22, no. 3, 1987, pp. 353–363.

Related Insights

Canadian Equities – Responsible Investing Report Insight
Nov 25, 2021

Canadian Equities – Responsible Investing Report

Learn more about our Canadian Equities team’s philosophy and approach to responsible investing.
Fiera Capital Embrace Duration in Rising Rates Insight
White Papers
Nov 9, 2021

Embrace Duration in Rising Rates?

Read our most recent white paper to see how thinking unconventionally and embracing duration at this point of the cycle can open the door to market opportunities.
Jason Carvalho
Senior Capability Specialist, Fixed Income